| 000 | 01460cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L136192 | ||
| 008 | 070117n2007 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u136192 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aBexley London Borough Council v Maison Maurice Ltd |
| 260 | _c2007 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2006] EWHC 3192 (Ch) |
|
| 520 | _aChD 15 December 2006. A local authority claimed ownership over a strip of land adjacent to a highway and had sought payment from the defendant property owner in return for a permanent right of access to the highway. The issue raised was whether the council was entitled to charge the defendant for licence to cross a ransom strip they had built along the southern boundary of his property and whether the ransom strip could be considered part of the highway. "Held": it was decided that the defendant had complied with all the planning conditions set by the local authority and that, as both parties had behaved as if the defendant had a right of way over the new crossover in place of its old right of way he could therefore reasonably expect that there would be a new permanent and safe access in substitution for the old without additional payment other than the local authority's costs, which had been paid. The claim was therefore dismissed. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aBEXLEY LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL V MAISON MAURICE LTD |
| 651 |
_aEngland _y886- |
||
| 690 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c78181 _d78181 |
||