000			01639cab a2200265 4500
001			##L136202
008			070117n2007 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u136202
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aQureshi, Khawar
245	0	0	_aArbitration and Article Six
260			_c2007
490		0	_aNew Law Journal _v157(7255) 12 January 2007, 46-47(2)
520			_aConsiders recent case law applying the European Convention on Human Rights Art 6 principles to arbitration and the courts' participation through the Arbitration Act 1996. In particular, discusses the issues in "Sumukan Ltd v Commonwealth Secretariat" (27 February 2006, unreported), "Stretford v Football Association Ltd" ([2006] EWHC 479 (Ch), All ER (D) 275), "AstraZeneca Insurance Co Ltd v CGU International Insurance plc" ([2006] EWCA Civ 1340, L135724), and "ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England" ([2006] EWCA Civ 1341, L135723). These decisions confirm that while Convention principles can be used in the arbitral context, they will only rarely give rise to ground for legal challenge.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aCGU INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE PLC AND OTHERS V ASTRAZENECA INSURANCE CO LTD
650	2	4	_aASM SHIPPING LTD OF INDIA V TTMI LTD OF ENGLAND
650	2	4	_aSTRETFORD V FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION LTD
650	2	4	_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6
650	2	4	_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
942			_n0
999			_c78191 _d78191