000			01822cab a2200265 4500
001			L136280
008			070123n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u136280
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aRodney Paul Lane v Peter Robin Woolway _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWLands RA 57 2005, 9 August 2006. An appeal by a ratepayer against the decision of the Central London Valuation Tribunal, confirming the assessment in the rating list of a club and premises. The appeal arises as a result of a programme of substantial building works opposite the entrance to the hereditament. The alteration from the building works resulted in the deletion of the existing entrance during the period while scaffolding was in place. This gave grounds for making the proposal that circumstances affecting the value of the property had changed, and therefore that the rating list was inaccurate. The respondent argued that the value of the property should be reduced by 100% whilst its access was impeded. "Held": a rating reduction of 75% of the original rating was allowed during the period the scaffolding was up, followed by a reduction of 50% on the original rating after the scaffolding was taken down.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aRODNEY PAUL LANE V PETER ROBIN WOOLWAY
650	2	4	_aCENTRAL LONDON VALUATION TRIBUNAL
650	2	4	_aLANDS TRIBUNAL ACT 1949
650	2	4	_aO'BRIEN V CLARK
650	2	4	_aJOHN LAING V KINGSWOOD ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
650	2	4	_aCONSETT IRON V NORTH WESTERN AREA DURHAM ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
650	2	4	_aCORUS UK V VALUATION OFFICE AGENCY
651		4	_aLONDON
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY TAXATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2006/RA_57_2005.html _zView the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78227 _d78227