000			01421cab a2200193 4500
001			##L136659
008			070214n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u136659
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aR J Knapman Ltd v Richards and Others _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWHC 2518 (TCC), 12 October 2006. Considered whether an employer may resist enforcement of an adjudicator's decision by applying a later set off in respect of liquidated and ascertained damages. Claimant contractors (K) applied to enforce an adjudicator's decision in their favour. The application was opposed by the defendants (R) on the grounds that K was seeking to enforce part of the decision and to repudiate the rest, and that R had a legitimate set-off arising out of the adjudicator's decision which extinguished the claim. "Held": K was entitled to obtain enforcement of the adjudicator's decision for payment of the full amount due without set off in respect of liquidated damages calculated by R.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aR J KNAPMAN LTD V RICHARDS AND OTHERS
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2006/2518.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78395 _d78395