000			01466cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS38753
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u12254
041			_aeng
245			_aWhitsbury Farm and Stud Ltd v Hemens (VO)
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1988) 2 WLR 72-82(11)
520			_aHL 10 December 1987. An appeal by ratepayers (W), owners and occupiers of four separate hereditaments, comprising stud buildings for breeding and rearing racehorses . (For CA decision see Abstract 37346). W had claimed exemption from rates in respect of the stud buildings. The VO agreed the paddocks were exempt as they were farmland within General Rate Act 1967 s26(4)(a) , but disputed W`s contention that the buildings were exempt as they were 1) "used solely in connection with agricultural operations", or they were, 2) "used for the keeping or breeding of livestock". The lvc upheld W`s claim, but was reversed by the LT, which was upheld by the CA. W appealed to the HL. It was held, dismissing W`s appeal, that 1) stud buildings did not fall within General Rate Act 1967 s26(4)(a) and thus did not qualify for exemption from rates. 2) An animal was not livestock within the Rating Act 1971 s2(1)(a) , unless it was kept for the production of food or wool, or for ... its use in the farming
650			_aSTUD FARM
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c7844 _d7844