000			01995cab a2200205 4500
001			##L136798
008			070223n2007 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u136798
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aMultiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd v Mott MacDonald Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 20 (TCC), 10 January 2007. Considered differing interpretations of what constituted pertinent records (under a novation agreement) and whether the adjudicator acted within his jurisdiction. Applicant company (M) employed respondent company (D) by a novation agreement for the provision of civil and structural engineering services for the construction of the new Wembley stadium. M wished to gain access to pertinent records held by D, exercising its right under the novation agreement. D refused, querying M's understanding of what constituted records in the context. An adjudicator's award favoured M, but D only offered a limited range of documents. M applied for equitable remedies and for summary judgment against D to enforce the adjudicator's decision. D argued that the adjudicator lacked jurisdiction to decide the meaning of pertinent records and that D had tried to comply with the adjudicator's decision. "Held": the adjudicator was within his jurisdiction because he was resolving a pre-existing dispute between the parties; he was entitled to formulate his own interpretation of pertinent records, regardless of whether he was right or wrong.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aMULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS (UK) LTD V MOTT MACDONALD LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2007/20.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78447 _d78447