000			01628cab a2200193 4500
001			L136801
008			070223n2007 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u136801
041			_aeng
245	0	0	_aPalfrey v. Wilson and another _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWCA Civ 94, 15 February 2007. The appellant appealed against an order that a wall between his property and the property of the respondents belonged to them. The former owner of the respondents' property had inserted a damp-proof course and carried out work to increase the height of the wall after receiving planning permission to do so. The judge held that the wall belonged to the respondents because the title had been acquired by adverse possession. The appellant submitted that the primary facts did not meet the conditions necessary to establish a claim to adverse possession. "Held": With consideration of the fact that, throughout the period of his ownership and occupation, the previous owner of the respondents' property had done all that was needed to maintain the whole of the wall, repairing it, inserting a damp proof course, and applying for planning permission and subsequently works, it was decided that these were unequivocal acts of adverse possession dispossessing the paper owner. The appeal was dismissed.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aPALFREY V WILSON AND ANOTHER
651		4	_aEngland _y886-
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-BOUNDARY DETERMINATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/94.html _zView the decision free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78448 _d78448