000			01755cab a2200229 4500
001			##L136802
008			070223n2007 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u136802
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aFiona Trust and Holding Corporation and others v Yuri Privalov and others _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWCA Civ 20, 24 January 2007. Considered whether an agreement to arbitrate can be seen as having an independent status where a larger contract has been procured by bribery. Appellant charterers appealed against a decision that a claim by respondent shipowners to rescind certain charterparties on the grounds of bribery should not be stayed for arbitration on the basis of the arbitration clause in the charters. "Held": appeal allowed. Any jurisdiction or arbitration clause in an international commercial contract should be liberally construed and the phrase 'arising out of' should cover every dispute except one over the existence of the contract. In the circumstances an arbitration clause did apply to the dispute about rescission of certain charterparties on the ground that they had been induced by bribery. The decision confirms the separability of an arbitration agreement under UK law.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aFIONA TRUST AND HOLDING CORPORATION AND OTHERS V PRIVALOV AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S7
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S72
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S9
651		4	_aUnited Kingdom _y
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/20.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78449 _d78449