000			01899cab a22002055a 4500
001			L137084
008			070313e2007 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u137084
041			_aeng
245			_aEpping Electrical Co Ltd v Briggs and Forrester (Plumbing Services) Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 4 (TCC), 19 January 2007. Considered whether an adjudicator's decision had been made out of time. Applicant (E) was sub-sub-contractor to respondent (B), the mechanical and electrical sub-contractor for a residential development. A dispute between the parties was referred to adjudication. An initial request by adjudicator (G) to extend the time to make his decision was consented by E, and a further seven day extension was consented by B. G completed his decision on the last day of that period, but refused to send it to the parties until he was paid, and released his decision two days later. B submitted that the decision was made out of time and G therefore had no jurisdiction to make it. E applied for summary judgment to enforce the adjudicator's decisions. "Held": application refused. Consent to an extension for time for G to reach his decision was conditional on the decision being issued by a particular date; when this had not happened there was no valid extension of time and G's decision given out of time was unenforceable.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S108
650	2	4	_aEPPING ELECTRICAL CO LTD V BRIGGS AND FORRESTER (PLUMBING SERVICES) LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2007/4.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78541 _d78541