000			02106cab a22002175a 4500
001			L137090
008			070314e2007 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u137090
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aJerry Jezierski v Dennis Patrick Osbourne (Valuations Officer) _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2006] EWLands RA_27_2006, 14 December 2006. An appeal by the ratepayer, Mr Jerry Jezierski, against the decision of the London South East Valuation Tribunal, confirming the assessment in the 2000 rating list of a shop. Mr Jezierski had no objection in principle to the value of £7,700. However as the result of subsequent events, he wished to pursue his appeal against the Valuation Tribunal's determination and seek a lower valuation. A surveyor approached Mr Jezierski, suggesting that the rates payable on his property were too high and promised to secure a substantial reduction if he were instructed to lodge a proposal. Mr Jezierski was visited by a representative of the Valuation Officer, who wished to re-measure the premises. Subsequently, the Valuation Officer made a proposal to increase the assessment of the appeal hereditament to RV £8,300 based on fact that the re-calculated floor area was greater than that on which the compiled list assessment had been based. Mr Jezierski's argument was that the Valuation Officer has not valued the property having regard to the way the floor space is actually used in connection with his business in alternative medicine. "Held": the appeal hereditament falls to be based on rental evidence and not other rating assessments. The judge found that the rateable value of £7,700 in the list was not excessive.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aFUTURES LONDON V STRATFORD
650	2	4	_aWILLIAM V SCOTTISH AND NEWCASTLE RETAIL
650	2	4	_aJEZIERSKI V VALUATION OFFICER
651		4	_aLONDON
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TAXATION-BUSINESS RATES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2006/RA_27_2006.html _zView the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78547 _d78547