000			01433cab a22002175a 4500
001			L137249
008			070326e2007 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u137249
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aHalevy, Tamar
245	0	0	_aAsk the expert
260			_c2007
490			_aNew Law Journal _v157(7263) 9 March 2007, 350-351(2)
520			_aConsiders expert determination and the question of what an expert should do if an issue arises that is outside his area of expertise. Discusses ?Bruce v Carpenter and others? ([[2006] EWHC 3301 (Ch), [2006] All ER (D) 405] where the expert valuer felt the interpretation of a clause in a company contract was outside her field of expertise. The court held that the expert was required to resolve the issue herself, despite it being outside her area of expertise. Looks at the implications of this decision and highlights the importance of spending time on expert determination clauses, possibly inserting into the clause the option for the expert to obtain advice from another expert in the appropriate field.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aBRUCE V CARPENTER AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aMERCURY COMMUNICATIONS LTD V DIRECTOR GENERAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-INDEPENDENT EXPERT DETERMINATION
942			_n0
999			_c78567 _d78567