000			01702cab a22002535a 4500
001			L137670
008			070424e2007 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u137670
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aFlannery, Louis
245	0	0	_aArbitration rules
260			_c2007
490		0	_aNew Law Journal _v157(7268) 13 April 2007, 508-509(2)
520			_aDiscusses two important cases which illustrate judicial support for arbitration. In "Fiona Trust and Holding Corp v Privalov" ([2007] EWCA Civ 20, L136802) the CA considered the concept of separability of arbitration clauses in contracts. The judgment concluded that the arbitrator had to have first say on the question about his jurisdiction and the shipowner's injunction application was dismissed. In "West Tankers Inc v RAS Riunione Adriatica di Sicurita SpA and others" ([2007] UKHL 4, [2007] All ER (D) 246) the HL considered whether or not anti-suit injunctions are still available to restrain court proceedings brought in breach of an arbitration clause. The judgment concluded that anti-suit injunctions in support of arbitration fall outside the scope of the EU Judgments Regulation 44/2001/EC.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aFIONA TRUST AND HOLDING CORPORATION AND OTHERS V PRIVALOV AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aTHROUGH TRANSPORT MUTUAL INSURANCE ASSOCIATION LTD V NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD
650	2	4	_aTURNER V GROVIT AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aREGULATION (EC) 44/2001
650	2	4	_aWEST TANKERS INC V RAS RIUNIONE ADRIATICA DI SICURITA SPA AND OTHERS
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
942			_n0
999			_c78686 _d78686