000			01410cab a22002535a 4500
001			L137798
008			070501e20070420xxk f g 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u137798
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aThornton, Justine
245	0	0	_aPower hungry
260			_c2007
490		0	_aSolicitors' Journal _v151(15) 20 April 2007, 496-497(2)
520			_aPlanning article considers the developing area of law regarding the legality of consultation processes. Takes the recent example of R (Greenpeace Ltd) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry. In that case, Greenpeace claimed that an express promise to consult them in a White Paper had not been kept. Addresses the relevance of the timing of consultations and level of information, particularly with regard to new information coming to light during the consultation process. Underlines the need of the judiciary to stay separate from national policy matters. Suggests the environmental and planning fields move to an enquiry-style consultation process with oral representations and witness cross-examinations.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aR V SOS TRADE AND INDUSTRY
650	2	4	_aR V BRENT LBC EX P GUNNING
650	2	4	_aR V NORTH & EAST DEVON HA EX P COUGHLAN
650	2	4	_aEDWARDS V ENVIRONMENT AGENCY
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
700	1		_aEdwards, Martin
942			_n0
999			_c78714 _d78714