| 000 | 00906cab a22001935a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L137932 | ||
| 008 | 070508e20070504xxk f g 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u137932 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aHemsley, Andrew | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aMade to measure |
| 260 | _c2007 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aBuilding _v272(8478) 4 May 2007, 53(1) |
|
| 520 | _aLooks at techniques used to deal with contractors' claims for disruption. Defines what constitutes a disruption and highlights how disruption was traditionally and badly handled. Notes that things have changed and summarises the following methods now used to analyse and present disruption to help to prove the loss: the measured mile, industry guidelines, expert opinion, time and motion, and global claims. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c78744 _d78744 |
||