000			01244cab a22002175a 4500
001			L138110
008			070517e20070505xxk f w 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u138110
041	0		_aeng
110	2		_aMarshall, Hazel
245	0	0	_aLandlord Protect Ltd v Dolman and Others
260			_c2007
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2007] 19 EG 154 (CS) (1)
520			_aConsiders whether it is unreasonable for freeholders to require personal guarantee as condition of consent or whether income from sublessees represents adequate security. L contended that D had unreasonably withheld their consent. "Held": The claim was dismissed. The freeholders were not sufficiently protected by the subleases as L had no assets other than the headlease. D had a right to a straightforward guarantee that rent would be paid when due. They had not acted unreasonably by rejecting a three-year limit on that guarantee as it would be needed outside that period.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD PROTECT LTD V DOLMAN AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aINTERNATIONAL DRILLING FLUIDS LTD V LOUISVILLE INVESTMENTS (UXBRIDGE) LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT
942			_n0
999			_c78788 _d78788