000			01553cab a22002295a 4500
001			L138132
008			070518s2007 xxk f w 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u138132
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aGeorge Wimpey UK Ltd V Tewkesbury Borough Council _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 628 (Admin), 3 April 2007. Considers a local plan for housing development and whether parts of that plan should be included even if they could not be developed within the timeframe. The applicant argued that a part of its land included within the defendant?s plans could not realistically be developed within its five-year housing plan. It argued further that two further areas of land should have been included in the plan, that inadequate reasons had been given for these decisions, and that the defendant should have reopened the local plan enquiry. "Held": It was found that the area of land which could not be realistically developed in time should be withdrawn from the plans. The two further areas of land were included for satisfactory reasons. The local plan enquiry did not require reopening. The application was granted in part.
650	2	4	_aGEORGE WIMPEY UK LTD V TEWKESBURY BC
650	2	4	_aPPG3
650	2	4	_aPPG12
650	2	4	_aDREXFINE HOLDINGS LTD v CHERWELL DC
650	2	4	_aRPG10
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2007/628.html _zView the article online at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78797 _d78797