000			01786cad a22002655a 4500
001			L138210
008			070522s2007 xxk f w 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u138210
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aJulie White V Knowsley Housing Trust and The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWCA Civ 404, 2 May 2007. Considers whether an assured tenancy ends on the date that possession is demanded, or continues until the date of vacation. W had been an assured tenant of her social landlord K. After accruing rent arrears she was served a possession order, but this was not put into effect since an agreement was reached. She was refused her right to buy the property as her tenancy had ended. W appealed against this decision, arguing that her continued residence represented the currency of the tenancy. "Held": The suspension of the possession order granted rights similar to those of the tenancy, but did not represent the continuation of that tenancy. The tenancy did not continue until the property was given up. The appeal was dismissed.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aWHITE V KNOWSLEY HOUSING TRUST AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aRENT ACT 1977
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 1985 PART V
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 1988 S9(2)
650	2	4	_aBRISTOL CITY COUNCIL V HASSAN AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aSHERRIN V BRAND
650	2	4	_aARTESIAN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS LTD V BECK AND ANOTHER
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-BREACHING RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/404.html _zView the article free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78816 _d78816