000			01825cad a22002535a 4500
001			L138215
008			070522e2007 xxk f w 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u138215
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aO'Connor and Another V Wiltshire County Council _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWCA Civ 426, 9 May 2007. Considers whether a road had been constructed by a highway authority, otherwise than on behalf of another person who was not a highway authority. C appealed against an LT decision (L133592) that the road had been constructed and maintained by the developers appointed by W and was therefore not publicly maintainable. This precluded C from making claim for compensation against W due to a reduction in the value of property caused by the proximity of the road. "Held": The effect of agreements between W and the developers was that W would construct the road through the agency of the developers. Although the developers had made a payment towards the costs under the Highways Act 1980 there W had not constructed the road on behalf of another person who was not a highway authority. Therefore the matter of the road's construction and maintenance did not bar C's claim for compensation. Appeal allowed.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aO'CONNOR V WILTSHIRE CC
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
650	2	4	_aHIGHWAYS ACT 1980 S36(2)(A)
650	2	4	_aHIGHWAYS ACT 1980 S274
650	2	4	_aHIGHWAYS ACT 1980 S278
650	2	4	_aLAND COMPENSATION ACT 1973 S19(3)
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/426.html _zView the article free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78817 _d78817