000			01627cad a22002175a 4500
001			L138338
008			070530s2007 xxk f w 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u138338
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aMainstream Properties Limited (Appellants) V Young and others and another (Respondents) _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] UKHL 21. Heard together with Douglas v Hello! Ltd and OBJ Ltd v Allan. M appealed against a decision that Y was not liable for the tort of interference with contractual relations. Two directors of M had diverted a property opportunity to a joint venture in which they were interested. This was in breach of their contract with M. Y wrongly believed that they would not be in breach and provided finance for the transaction. ?Held?: If the breach of contract was not the purpose of an action, but merely a foreseeable consequence, then it could not be said to be intentional. Accordingly, there had been no breach of contract and therefore no liability for interference. Y honestly believed that he would not be involved in a breach of contract. He could not be said to have been indifferent to such a breach. Appeal dismissed.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aMAINSTREAM PROPERTIES LTD V YOUNG AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aLUMLEY V GYE
650	2	4	_aBRITISH INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS V FERGUSON
651		4	_aInternational
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldjudgmt/jd070502/obg-1.htm _zView the article free of charge at www.publications.parliament.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c78834 _d78834