| 000 | 01190cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS54807 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u12344 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHiggins and another v Hatch and Fielding | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1996] 10 EG 162-166(5) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 9 June 1995. In 1983, plaintiffs (H) purchased a house on the basis of defendants` (F) valuation and survey report noting slight general settlement of old standing valuing the property for £21,000. In 1990, serious signs of subsidence were discovered. H commissioned experts` reports from structural engineers. H commissioned the present action relying on Limitation Act 1990 s14A. CC dismissed claim on the grounds that H was aware of the material facts in 1990. On appeal, the claim for extension of limitation under s14A was dismissed upholding CC decision. | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION ACT 1980 S14A | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION PERIOD | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aSUBSIDENCE | ||
| 650 | _aVALUATION REPORT | ||
| 650 | _aVALUERS | ||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c7893 _d7893 |
||