000			01825cab a22002175a 4500
001			L138693
008			070703e20070504xxk f w 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u138693
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aRegus (UK) Limited V Epcot Solutions Limited _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 938 (Comm), 4 May 2007. Epcot Solutions Ltd (E) had rented serviced office accommodation from Regus (UK) Ltd (R) under their standard terms, one of which claimed to exclude liability "in any circumstances" for loss of business or anticipated savings, damage to data, third party claims or consequential loss - or in respect of any other claims, damage expenses or losses. R failed to make effective efforts to repair a faulty air conditioning system, which E claimed was affecting its business. Due to this failure, E ceased making payments and R made a claim for unpaid fees, to which E responded with a counterclaim for these damages due to the loss of business this caused. "Held": R had contracted to provide services including air conditioning, which it had clearly failed to do. The exclusion clause was not reasonable in that it attempted to exclude any losses caused by its own failure to supply services. However it was noted that while these losses had been significant, they were not crucial to E's business. Judgement accordingly.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aREGUS (UK) LTD V EPCOT SOLUTIONS LTD
650	2	4	_aUNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT 1977 S11
650	2	4	_aRUXLEY ELECTRONICS AND CONSTRUCTION LTD V FORSYTH
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2007/938.html _zView the article free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78956 _d78956