000			01730cab a22002175a 4500
001			L138708
008			070704e20070517xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u138708
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aDolphin Quays Developments Ltd v Peter Mills, Robert William Birchall and Barry Gordon Gilbertson _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 1180 (Ch), 17 May 2007. Applicant (M) applied for costs against receivers (R) for the failed damages claim brought against M by company (D) to whom R had been appointed receivers. D had claimed damages in respect of the difference between the purchase price that defendant (M) had allegedly agreed to pay for a leasehold flat and the sum obtained by D on its re-sale on the open market. It was held that the purchase of the flat and the part settlement of the debt amounted to one transaction, not two separate and independently enforceable transactions, as the receivers had argued ([2006] EWHC 931 (Ch)). "Held": M's application for costs refused. There were no exceptional features in D's initial claim to warrant a third part costs order and no impropriety or unreasonableness on the part of R. R were simply agents of D and did not benefit from the initial proceedings.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aDOLPHIN QUAYS DEVELOPMENTS LTD V MILLS AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989 S2
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S109(2)
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL LEASES
856	4	8	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2007/1180.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c78965 _d78965