000			01536cab a22002655a 4500
001			L138722
008			070705s2007 xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u138722
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aOliver, Laura
245	0	0	_aLet there be light! _brecent rights of light cases and the implications for developers
260			_c2007
490			_aLovells Real Estate Quarterly _vJune 2007, 1-4(4)
520			_aExamines recent legal rulings which have given right to light claims a significant boost against the buying power of developers. Until recently most developers preferred to pay damages costs, as this was the expected outcome of any rulings in against them. Tamares V Fairpoint Properties (L136179) showed that damages may be considered appropriate, rather than an injunction. However, Regan V Paul Properties (L135566) showed that if objections are lodged early enough, the granting of an injunction may be the more appropriate ruling. The level of damages awarded to Tamares (L136793) also serves as a warning to developers.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aRIGHT TO LIGHT
650	2	4	_aPRESCRIPTION ACT 1832
650	2	4	_aSHELFER V CITY OF LONDON ELECTRIC LIGHTING CO
650	2	4	_aMIDTOWN LTD V CITY OF LONDON REAL PROPERTY CO LTD
650	2	4	_aTAMARES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD V FAIRPOINT PROPERTIES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD
650	2	4	_aREGAN V PAUL PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS
651		4	_aUnited Kingdom _y
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-EASEMENTS-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATION
942			_n0
999			_c78971 _d78971