| 000 | 01393cab a22002775a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L139554 | ||
| 008 | 070730e20070728xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u139554 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aFrancis, Andrew | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aTinkering really won't do the trick |
| 260 | _c2007 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0730) 28 July 2007, 124-126(3) |
||
| 520 | _aReports on the current state of the law of easements and covenants. The Law Commission is currently reviewing these laws and will publish a consultation paper this year. Acquisition of an easement by prescription is via an archaic process. The express granting of easements still leaves room for uncertainty over terms. There is also no statutory power to discharge or modify easements. Identifying the distinction between restrictive and positive covenants can be problematic. Rules governing restrictive covenants can be complex. Lands Tribunal jurisdiction is costly and slow. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPRESCRIPTION ACT 1832 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aWHEELDON V BURROWS |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aGREENWICH HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST V LONDON AND QUADRANT HOUSING TRUST |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aCREST NICHOLSON (SOUTH) LTD V MCALLISTER |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aREGAN V PAUL PROPERTIES |
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c79052 _d79052 |
||