000			01952cad a22002295a 4500
001			L139846
008			070815e20070514xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u139846
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aDavid and Teresa Bothma T/A DAB Builders v Mayhaven Healthcare Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWCA Civ 527, 14 May 2007. Considered whether more than one dispute may be referred to adjudication. The claimant contractor (B) applied for leave of appeal to enforce an adjudicator's decision that determined disputes arising out of a JCT IFC 98 form of contract. The Scheme for Construction Contracts was the applicable adjudication procedure. B gave notice of adjudication, identifying four disputes, and the adjudicator directed the defendant company (M) to make two payments to B. M refused, asserting that two distinct disputes had been referred to and by deciding both the adjudicator was not within his jurisdiction. B's claim for summary judgment was refused and B applied for leave of appeal. "Held": application refused. The amount payable under valuation nine was unconnected with the three other matters in the notice of adjudication and therefore there were two disputes, which meant the adjudicator had no jurisdiction.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aBOTHMA V MAYHAVEN HEALTHCARE LTD
650	2	4	_aJCT INTERMEDIATE FORM OF BUILDING CONTRACT FOR WORKS OF SIMPLE CONTENT (1998 EDITION)
650	2	4	_aSCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS (ENGLAND AND WALES) REGULATIONS 1998
650	2	4	_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/527.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c79105 _d79105