000			01600cab a22001935a 4500
001			L139847
008			070815e20070503xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u139847
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aSydenhams (Timber Engineering) Ltd v CHG Holdings Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 1129 (TCC), 3 May 2007. Considered whether an employer should pay a specialist contractor directly following the main contractor's insolvency. The defendant developer (C) had appointed contractor (R) for a hotel development in Bournemouth, but prior to completion of the works R went into administration. Before C appointed R, it contacted claimants (S) to obtain quotes for the timber frame, windows and internal joinery work. Disputes arose regarding payments to S, with S claiming it had a direct contract with C and was entitled to full payment by C, regardless of R's insolvency. C claimed that S was employed as a subcontractor to R and since R was in administration, C was unable to make direct payments to S. "Held": judgment for S. C was liable to make direct payments to S as it was found that S had a direct contract with C from the outset and never became subcontractor to R.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aSYDENHAMS (TIMBER ENGINEERING) LTD V CHG HOLDINGS LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2007/1129.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c79106 _d79106