000			01789cad a22002175a 4500
001			L139850
008			070815e20070531xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u139850
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aAC Yule and Son Ltd v Speedwell Roofing and Cladding Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 1360 (TCC), 31 May 2007. Considers the enforcement of an adjudicator's decision apparently issued late and estoppel by silence. Claimant (Y) commenced adjudication proceedings against defendant (S) in accordance with the Scheme for Construction Contracts. The adjudicator sought more time and Y agreed to a 14 day extension, bringing the decision date to 3 April 2007. The adjudicator's decision was made on 4 April and S refused to pay Y, arguing the decision was after the agreed extended period and a nullity. "Held": the judge rejected S?s argument and enforced the adjudicator?s decision. S?s silence and conduct during the week before the decision was due had been consistent with it having agreed to an extension to 5 April (as requested by the adjudicator and agreed to by Y). Therefore the judge agreed that there had been an estoppel by silence.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aAC YULE AND SON LTD V SPEEDWELL ROOFING & CLADDING LTD
650	2	4	_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650	2	4	_aSCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS (ENGLAND AND WALES) REGULATIONS 1998
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2007/1360.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c79108 _d79108