000			01646cad a22001935 4500
001			L139946
008			070822e20070622xxk f v 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u139946
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aP & S Amusements Ltd v Valley House Leisure Ltd and Peter Alfred Valentine _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 1494 (Ch), 22 June 2007. Further to a previous judgment ([2006] EWHC 1510 (Ch), L134174) the court had to decide if any sums were owed to the claimant tenant (P) on an enquiry in respect of the damage suffered by it resulting from the breach of a beer-tie by the first defendant underlessee (V), and whether V had been in breach of implied terms of the beer-tie from a later date. P contended that V had been receiving rebates from V's chosen supplier on the sale of designated beers which should have been paid to P, in consequence of V acting in breach of implied terms of the beer-tie agreement. V claimed the agreement did not incorporate the alleged implied terms and that P was also estopped from relying on such terms. "Held": the alleged implied terms had not been incorporated into the agreement; P had suffered no loss as a result of a breach of that agreement, so P was entitled only to nominal damages.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aP AND S AMUSEMENTS LTD V VALLEY HOUSE LEISURE LTD AND ANOTHER
651	4		_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2007/1494.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c79142 _d79142