000			02033cad a22002415a 4500
001			L139973
008			070824e20070807xxk f w 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u139973
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aLondon Borough of Islington V Abdel-Malek _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_aLands Tribunal LRX/90/2006, 16 July 2007. The appellant authority (I) appealed against a ruling that it had failed to provide sufficient information to the respondent tenant (A) regarding the estimates of different companies when performing repairs upon her flat. A was the leaseholder of a flat in a block managed by I. I proposed to carry out cyclical maintenance and repairs upon all the flats in A's block and some other blocks. Several estimates were obtained, but the breakdown in price as to the tenant's block, and therefore the share of the cost she would pay, was only given in respect of the company awarded the contract. It had been ruled that this did not fulfil I's obligation to provide a full breakdown of costs. "Held": It was incumbent upon I to provide full details of all estimates for the proposed works. That this was administratively inconvenient did not alter the fact. Full detail was to be given in respect of all estimates, rather than just the lowest or that which won the contract. Although A had sufficient time to budget for payment, this did not alter the facts of the case. Appeal dismissed.
590			_aKA NTK
650	2	4	_aRICHMOND HOUSING PARTNERSHIP V SMITH
650	2	4	_aGILJE AND OTHERS V CHARLEGROVE SECURITIES LTD AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aLONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON V ABDEL-MALEK
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 S20
650	2	4	_aLONDON BOROUGH OF HARINGEY V BALL AND OTHERS
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL LEASES
856	4	8	_uhttps://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/aspx/view.aspx?id=454 _zView the judgment free of charge at www.landstribunal.gov.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c79146 _d79146