000			01819cab a22003255a 4500
001			L140083
008			070904s2007 xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u140083
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aSams, Gary
245	0	0	_aLaw briefing _bcompulsory purchase and compensation update _b2007
260			_c2007
490		0	_aJournal of Property Investment and Finance _v25(4) 2007, 410-415(2)
520			_aReviews two key compensation cases of the last 12 months. "Crowley and Jarvis v Liverpool PSDA Ltd and Liverpool City Council" ([2007] EWLands ACQ/47/2005, L138709) deals with all aspects of a disturbance claim, including backing a method to assessing compensation for goodwill which questions the traditional method, preferred by the tribunal for time immemorial. "Moto Hospitality Ltd v Highways Agency" ([2006] EWLands LCA/122/2005) is an unusual example of a successful claim under the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 s10, culminating in a substantial entitlement to compensation.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aCROWLEY AND ANOTHER V LIVERPOOL PSDA AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aMOTO HOSPITALITY LTD V HIGHWAYS AGENCY
650	2	4	_aDIRECTOR OF BUILDINGS AND LANDS V SHUN FUNG IRONWORKS LTD
650	2	4	_aBEDE DISTRIBUTORS LTD V NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE CORPORATION
650	2	4	_aKWIK SAVE STORES LTD V STOCKTON ON TEES BC
650	2	4	_aOPTICAL EXPRESS (SOUTHERN) LTD V BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL
650	2	4	_aMETROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS V MCCARTHY
650	2	4	_aJOLIFFE V EXETER CORPORATION
650	2	4	_aBENJAMIN V STORR
650	2	4	_aCALEDONIAN RAILWAY CO V WALKER'S TRUSTEES
650	2	4	_aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 1965 S10
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
999			_c79182 _d79182