| 000 | 01256cab a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L140162 | ||
| 008 | 070910e20070907xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u140162 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBessey, James | |
| 245 | _aOpening Pandora's box | ||
| 260 | _c2007 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aBuilding _v272(8496) 7 September 2007, 55(1) |
|
| 520 | _aDiscusses the possible implications of government proposals to remove the requirement for construction contracts to be in writing. Argues that this proposal would let the adjudicator decide what the contract is or not, which could lead to a number of problems. Suggests there may be an increase in the use of clauses that aim to exclude anything extraneous from being part of the contract. In addition, more cases could follow on from adjudication because the adjudicator incorrectly concludes what the contract is. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 PART II |
| 651 | 4 |
_aGreat Britain _y1707- |
|
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c79211 _d79211 |
||