000			01553cad a22002535a 4500
001			L140201
008			070912e20070704xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u140201
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aDeLaney, Caroline
245	0	0	_aRights to light _brecent decisions _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
490		0	_aRICS Feature _v4 July 2007
520			_aDiscusses two recent rights to light cases. In "Tamares (Vincent Square) Ltd v Fairpoint Properties (Vincent Square) Ltd" ([2006] EWHC 3589 (Ch), L136179, [2007] EWHC 212 (Ch), L136793) the court applied the rule in "Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co Ltd" ([1895] 1 Ch 287) and concluded it would be oppressive to grant an injunction, and awarded damages of £50 000, just below 30% of the developer's profits. In "Regan v Paul Properties Ltd" ([2006] EWCA Civ 1319, L135566), an injunction was granted by the CA as the developer had taken a risk in continuing after Regan's complaint, even though it had received incorrect advice.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aTAMARES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD V FAIRPOINT PROPERTIES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD
650	2	4	_aSHELFER V CITY OF LONDON ELECTRIC LIGHTING CO
650	2	4	_aREGAN V PAUL PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-EASEMENTS-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATION
710			_aCameron McKenna _93669
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.rics.org/RICSWEB/getpage.aspx?p=P4nMzzwO6UGXClxMK2Qv9A _zView the article free of charge at www.rics.org...
942			_n0
999			_c79231 _d79231