000			01755cad a22003015a 4500
001			L140207
008			070912e20070704xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u140207
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aChoat, Rupert
245	0	0	_aAdjudication _blate referrals, late decisions and invalid rules _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
490		0	_aRICS Feature _v4 July 2007
520			_aExplains how four recent cases have clarified what happens when an adjudication timetable overruns. The cases have highlighted inequalities between adjudications under different rules, and some leading adjudication decisions have been invalidated. Considers the referral of the dispute within seven days of the adjudication notice, when the 28 days period for the decision runs from, the adjudicator's decision being reached within the 28 day (or extended) period, and the validity of decisions reached on time but communicated a day or two late.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aHART INVESTMENTS LTD V FIDLER AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S107
650	2	4	_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S108
650	2	4	_aSCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
650	2	4	_aEPPING ELECTRICAL CO LTD V BRIGGS AND FORRESTER (PLUMBING SERVICES) LTD
650	2	4	_aCUBBITT BUILDING AND INTERIORS LTD V FLEETGLADE LTD
650	2	4	_aAVEAT HEATING LTD V JERRAM FALKUS CONSTRUCTION LTD
650	2	4	_aSIMONS CONSTRUCTION LTD V AARDVARK DEVELOPMENTS LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
710	2		_aCameron McKenna _93669
942			_n0
999			_c79233 _d79233