| 000 | 01348cab a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L140208 | ||
| 008 | 070912e20070831xxka f w 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u140208 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aRoss, Jonathan | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aPetal fatigue |
| 260 | _c2007 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aProperty Week _v72(35) 31 August 2007, 60(1) |
|
| 520 | _aQBD, 17 July 2007. How a landlord narrowly avoided liability for its tenant's cleaning policy. A man who slipped on a petal outside a flower shop as he walked across the forecourt of a train station, seriously injuring himself, sued both the tenant of the flower shop, and the site landlord, for negligence. Held: the flower shop owner was negligent in not having a proactive system for clearing up messy petals. The claim against the landlord was dismissed. However, the court stated that the landlord could have done more to oblige the tenant to maintain higher standards. Case shows that to avoid liability for claims, landlords would be advised to make sure that they properly enforce the obligations of their tenants. | ||
| 590 | _aKA NTK | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aOCCUPIERS LIABILITY ACT 1957 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPICCOLO V LARKSTOCK LTD AND CHILTERN RAILWAY COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS |
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c79234 _d79234 |
||