000 01396cad a22002415a 4500
001 L140209
008 070912e20070704xxk f 000 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u140209
041 0 _aeng
100 1 _aGibson, Cheryl
245 0 0 _aContractor's all risks insurance
_bfortuity revisited
_h[electronic resource]
260 _c2007
490 0 _aRICS Feature
_v4 July 2007
520 _aDiscusses "CA Blackwell v Gerling Allegemeine Verischerungs AG" ([2007] EOHC 94 (Comn), unreported) which considered whether a contractor was covered under a Contractor's All Risks (CAR) insurance policy when rain caused damage to its earth moving works. The insurer claimed the damage was inevitable and the loss resulted from wilful misconduct. However, while the contractor may have been negligent, it had not been reckless and the damage was covered by the CAR. In addition, an element of fortuity existed which meant the damage was not inevitable.
590 _aKA
650 2 4 _aCA BLACKWELL V GERLING ALLEGEMEINE VERISCHERUNGS AG
650 2 4 _aCONTRACTORS ALL RISKS INSURANCE
651 4 _aEngland and Wales
_y1543-
690 _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
710 2 _aCameron McKenna
_93669
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.rics.org/RICSWEB/getpage.aspx?p=QIhmZd8NLEWASk7dk1pMqQ
_zView the article free of charge at www.rics.org...
942 _n0
999 _c79235
_d79235