000			01778cab a22003135a 4500
001			L140372
008			070920e20070915xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u140372
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aRadley-Gardner, Oliver
245	0	0	_aShut out of Europe
260			_c2007
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0737) 15 September 2007, 228-229(2)
520			_aReports on the case of J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom 44302/02 [2007] PLSCS 179. The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that adverse possession of land under the Land Registration Act 1925 is not a breach of Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights. This reverses the decision of the original (ECtHR) judgment. Following this precedent, after 10 years' adversarial possession, squatters may apply to be registered as proprietor. Even allowing for objections the squatter will have limited statutory success. If there are no objections the squatter will be registered as proprietor. This ruling leaves the matter in the hands of English courts and future cases may still be bound by High Court decisions.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aJ A PYE (OXFORD) LTD V UNITED KINGDOM (2007)
650	2	4	_aJ A PYE (OXFORD) LTD V GRAHAM
650	2	4	_aPYE (OXFORD) LTD & ANOR V UNITED KINGDOM
650	2	4	_aBUCKINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL V MORAN
650	2	4	_aBEAULANE PROPERTIES LTD V PALMER
650	2	4	_aLIMITATION ACT 1980
650	2	4	_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925
650	2	4	_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
650	2	4	_aBUCKINGHAMSHIRE CC V MORAN
651		4	_aUnited Kingdom _y
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL-REGISTRATION OF TITLE TO PROPERTY-LAND REGISTRATION
700	1		_aSmall, Jonathan
942			_n0
999			_c79259 _d79259