| 000 | 01273cad a22002415a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L140903 | ||
| 008 | 071017e20061019xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u140903 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aDefoe, Peter S. | |
| 240 | 0 | _aWas Waldram wrong? | |
| 245 | 0 | 4 |
_aThe validity of daylight calculations in rights to light _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 |
_aRICS Feature _v16 October 2006 |
||
| 520 | _aRights of light surveyors accept that the light from 0.2% of the skydome provides one lumen of light and that is sufficient for ordinary needs. This paper examines the validity of this by examining the original methods of calculation and comparing these with some more recent methodologies. It can be shown that there is a case for reassessing the methodologies currently accepted by the courts and for proposing a new more accurate method. [Taken from paper abstract]. | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aWALDRAM DIAGRAM |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPRESCRIPTION ACT 1832 S3 |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-EASEMENTS-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATION | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aFrame, Ian | |
| 856 | 4 | 8 |
_uhttps://www.rics.org/RICSWEB/getpage.aspx?p=1XHgHEB1N0-uOIFK92q_2A _zView the paper free of charge at www.rics.org... |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c79373 _d79373 |
||