000			01775cad a22002175a 4500
001			L140949
008			071022e20070618xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u140949
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aLancaster-Thomas v Teignbridge District Council _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWLands LCA_167_2005, 18 June 2007. Considers whether compensation was due to the owner of a farm and land due to loss of value to property caused by the owner's inability to construct a boundary fence due to the refusal of planning permission. The claimant, Ms Lancaster-Thomas (L) argued that the refusal of planning permission for a fence and gate reduced value of her property. Valuations were produced to support this claim, but no comparables were offered. L argued that the existing hedge could not be used as a boundary and that without a fence border plot was of little value to prospective purchasers. "Held": The valuation of the damages suffered by L was not based on substantive comparable valuations and relied heavily on the market appraisal of the property. It was small enough that given the excellent position of the property and strength of the market, any loss suffered would be absorbed by the market. No compensation was payable.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLANCASTER-THOMAS V TEIGNBRIDGE DC
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (GENERAL PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT) ORDER 1995
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2007/LCA_167_2005.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c79387 _d79387