000			01576cab a22001815a 4500
001			L140978
008			071024e20071009xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u140978
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aMalmesbury and others v Strutt and Parker _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 2199 (QB), 9 October 2007. Considers whether a sum of damages previously awarded could be increased after an order giving effect to that judgment was in place. The applicant (M) was the owner of a car park who had previously established (L138156) that the defendant surveyors (S) had been negligent in failing to provide advice as to the setting of rent pursuant to income from the car park. It had been established that assessment of the damages was to be determined relating to value at the time of the transaction (L138264). M applied for an increase in the amount of compensation to be paid by S. "Held": It was only possible for the judge to alter such an order, in appropriate circumstances, prior to its taking effect. This order was in place and so the only option available to a dissatisfied party was to appeal the decision. The order was to be treated as a bar for the court's ability to reconsider that issue. Application refused.
650	2	4	_aMALMESBURY AND OTHERS V STRUTT AND PARKER
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-NEGLIGENCE
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2007/2199.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c79403 _d79403