000			01383cab a22002055a 4500
001			L141058
008			071025e20071019xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u141058
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aGordon, Warren
245	0	0	_aSquatter's plight
260			_c2007
490			_aProperty Week _v72(42) 19 October 2007, 105(1)
520			_aDescribes the case of SS Global and LPA Receivers of Delphis Bank v Sava. The defendant (S) claimed to have acquired most of a green belt of land in North London by adverse possession. He applied to the Land Registry for ownership. Their deputy adjudicator found for S. The appellant (G) appealed against that decision, arguing that the law was incorrectly applied. S had to prove that he had uninterrupted possession from a set date prior to his claim. Possession was defined as a sufficient degree of exclusive physical control of the land. He also needed to have demonstrated sufficient intention to possess. "Held": Upon appeal the High Court took an entirely different view of the evidence than the Land Registry adjudicator. The evidence of possession was unconvincing that S had demonstrated neither exclusive possession nor the intention to possess.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aSS GLOBAL AND OTHERS V SAVA
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL
942			_n0
999			_c79417 _d79417