000			01744cab a22002175a 4500
001			L141130
008			071029e20071025xxk v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u141130
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aEarl Cadogan and Cadogan Estates Limited v Michele Francesco Sportelli and Kara-Lynn Victoria Lemont Sportelli and three other appeals _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWCA Civ 1042, 25 October 2007. The appeals concerned the deferment rate which is applied to vacant possession value and the proper valuation of any hope value in collective enfranchisement decisions. The appeals fell into two groups: appeals against the decision of the Lands Tribunal (LT) that hope value should not be included in the price payable for collective enfranchisement or lease extensions; and appeals against the decision of the LT to reject market evidence in setting the deferment rate. Held: The LT were right to conclude that hope value is not a permissable element in valuations under schedule 6 or 13, and there was no error of law in the LT's decision on deferment rates. Appeals therefore dismissed in respect of both the hope value and deferment rate issues.
590			_aKA NTK
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 SCHED 6
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 SCHED 13
650	2	4	_aEARL CADOGAN AND ANOTHER V SPORTELLI AND ANOTHER
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aRESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL LEASES-RESIDENTIAL LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/1042.html _zView the judgement free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c79419 _d79419