000			01337cab a22002415a 4500
001			L141553
008			071130e20071027xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u141553
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aMurdoch, Sandi
245	0	0	_aIt pays to be reminded now and then
260			_c2007
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0743) 27 October 2007, 199(1)
520			_aConsiders the implications of two significant County Court decisions which relate to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. The ability to exclude the 1954 Act by contracting out was introduced in 1969. However this has given rise to an increased risk of negligence claims against professional advisers. The cases examined are Patel v Chiltern Railway Co Ltd [2007] PLSCS 156 and Samuel Smith (Southern) Ltd v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd [2007] 1 EGLR 107. The former case questions the circumstances and need for a statutory declaration. The latter examines statutory terms of renewal.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
650	2	4	_aREGULATORY REFORM (BUSINESS TENANCIES) (ENGLAND AND WALES) ORDER 2003
650	2	4	_aPATEL V CHILTERN RAILWAY CO LTD
650	2	4	_aSAMUEL SMITH (SOUTHERN) LTD V HOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD
651		4	_aUnited Kingdom _y
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASE RENEWAL
942			_n0
999			_c79521 _d79521