| 000 | 01241cab a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L141611 | ||
| 008 | 071205e20071201xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u141611 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aTonkin, Paul | |
| 245 | 0 | 2 | _aA balancing exercise |
| 260 | _c2007 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0748) 1 December 2007, 140-141(2) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the landlord's position when tenants go into administration. Changes to law have made it far easier to put companies into administration, resulting in a 1000% increase in cases since 2003. The landlord should not expect to recover full rent. Surrender of the property by the tenant may be blocked by the administrator. Surrender also fails to terminate subtenancies. Forfeiture relies upon its permissibility within the lease and may conflict with the administrator's plans. Courts are likely to grant forfeiture unless the lease is required to further the administration process. Outlines such conditions. Case law. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aENTERPRISE ACT 2002 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 |
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-BUSINESS TENANTS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c79543 _d79543 |
||