| 000 | 01242cab a22002535a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L141812 | ||
| 008 | 071221e20071123xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u141812 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aFancourt, Timothy | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aGetting the price right |
| 260 | _c2007 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Law Journal _v157(7298) 23 November 2007, |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the impact of the recent Lords Court of Appeal decision in the case of Earl Cadogan v Sportelli (L141130) on the determination of enfranchisement prices. Explains that hope value will play no part in the value determination. Leasehold valuation tribunals should apply 4.75% for houses and 5% for flats in central London, notwithstanding credible evidence otherwise. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aEARL CADOGAN AND ANOTHER V SPORTELLI AND ANOTHER |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHOUSING ACT 1996 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aCOMMONHOLD AND LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 2002 |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL LEASES-RESIDENTIAL LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c79593 _d79593 |
||