000			01608cad a22001935a 4500
001			L142220
008			080130e20070718xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u142220
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aBarton (Valuation Officer) v Brown (t/a Cardbar Ltd) _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWLands RA_83_2006. 18 July 2007.The appellant valuation officer appealed against a valuation tribunal decision to cut the rateable value of retail premises owned by the respondent ratepayer (B) in a shopping centre. B proposed to alter the rating list because the entry was inaccurate; it had increased much more than other shops in the centre. The valuation officer defended the rateable value compared to a number of comparable settlements on shops in the centre and argued that a tone of list had been established. Not accepted by the tribunal. The Valuation officer appealed following a re-measurement of the premises, arguing the tribunal had failed to consider relevant comparable evidence establishing a tone of list. Held: appeal allowed. The tribunal had been wrong to reject the evidence of the valuation officer; a tone of list had been established and it was right to give weight to settlements agreed with occupiers and their agents.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aBARTON (VALUATION OFFICER) V BROWN (TRADING AS CARDBAR LTD)
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY APPRAISAL AND VALUATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2007/RA_83_2006.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c79749 _d79749