| 000 | 01330cab a22002775a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L142223 | ||
| 008 | 080130e20080126xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u142223 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aCohen, Roger | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aCheck out the vicinity |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0803) 26 January 2008, 170-171(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the concept of neighbours in law and examines the restrictions this can place on developers. Statutory obligations, easements and restrictive covenants can give landowners the benefit of curbing development on neighbouring land. However there is no judicial definition of the term neighbour. Cases have often focused on the related notion of neighbourhood. Suggests that a neighbour is someone sufficiently proximate to be adversely affected by acts of unneighbourliness. Presents a case study and refers to case law. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aACCESS TO NEIGHBOURING LAND ACT 1992 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR ACT 2003 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aRUSSELL V ARCHDALE |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aSHELLCOVE GARDENS PROPERTY LTD V NORTH SYDNEY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLEE V ROUNDWOOD COLLIERY CO |
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aSeitler, Jonathan | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c79751 _d79751 |
||