000			01460cad a22002055a 4500
001			L142226
008			080130e20070312xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u142226
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aCameron Ltd v Rolls-Royce PLC _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a [2007] EWHC 546 (Ch), 12 March 2007. The claimant (C) applied for summary judgement on a claim for specific performance of two agreements for commercial leases between C as landlord and the defendant (R) as tenant. R subleased commercial premises from C under two separate subleases, each contracted out of the security of tenure provisions. When the subleases expired, pending renewal of the leases, R was given a licence to remain on the same terms as the subleases. R claimed that the purported licence was a protected lease; therefore it was entitled to remain beyond the expiry date of the agreement was entitled to tenancy rights, namely security of tenure. Held: judgement for claimant. The agreement was clearly not intended to grant a tenancy. The licence was a stand alone transaction with a clear, separate purpose.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
650	2	4	_aCAMERON LTD V ROLLS-ROYCE PLC
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2007/546.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c79753 _d79753