| 000 | 01030cab a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L142420 | ||
| 008 | 080213e20080131xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u142420 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aMcCarthy, Hui Ling | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aWhere are we now? |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 490 |
_aTaxation _v161(4142) 31 January 2008, 98-100(3) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the reasons for the dropping of the government's intended Planning Gain Supplement (PGS). Considers the industry's response to this and examines likely options for a replacement policy. Places the PGS in its historical perspective. Argues that many considered it too complicated, and this led to significant opposition which caused the plan to be shelved. Considers the merits of a tariff-based alternative which has been suggested by some in the industry. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPLANNING GAIN SUPPLEMENT |
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 |
_aPlanning and development _96259 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c79803 _d79803 |
||