| 000 | 01286cab a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L142658 | ||
| 008 | 080227e20080219xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u142658 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aGreenish, Damian | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aOnce a house, always a house? |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors' Journal _v152(7) 19 February 2008, 18-20(2) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders how the case of Boss Holdings v Grosvenor West End Properties and others (L142656) will affect future leasehold enfranchisements. Reviews previous cases addressing the definition of a house. Explains the Boss judgment that the building's original purpose is the deciding factor. There is no requirement that a house be currently suitable for habitation. Considers the surprising conclusion, based on language in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, that a building is a house even if subsequently adapted for another use. Argues that some buildings which would not have originally been intended now fall within scope of the Act. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aBOSS HOLDINGS LTD V GROSVENOR WEST END PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S2(1) |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c79898 _d79898 |
||