000			01302cab a22002175a 4500
001			L142659
008			080227e20080223xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u142659
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aConway, David
245	0	2	_aA question of design
260			_c2008
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0807) 23 Febrary 2008, 136-137(2)
520			_aDescribes the case of Boss Holdings v Grosvenor West End Properties (L142656) which allowed the enfranchisement of a severely dilapidated mixed-use building originally built as a house. Discusses the likelihood of a rush of similar claims. A building had originally been built for residential purposes. It was subsequently used for mixed commercial and residential use, and then became dilapidated and unsuitable for habitation. Nevertheless the Lords found that it was still defined as a house by its original intended use. Notes that this should warn landlords not to become involved in complex enfranchisement proceedings fixed upon a historic valuation level.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aBOSS HOLDINGS LTD V GROSVENOR WEST END PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S2(1)
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
942			_n0
999			_c79899 _d79899